[HSK 6] ???????? - Controversy Over “Adult English” on the Edge

Sexy livestreamers teaching so-called adult English are questioned as soft pornography. Lawyers say it violates rules, and platforms should bear regulatory responsibility.???????? - Controversy Over “Adult English” on the Edge [HSK 6]Download the app here:Chinese Short Dialogue | App StoreChinese Short Dialogue | Google PlayAvailable in 8 languages on the app:Chinese Listening | ??? ??? | ???????? | ??????????? ?? ?????????? ????? | Nghe ti?ng Trung | Mendengarkan bahasa Mandarin | Escucha en chino | ????????????? | Chinesisches Hören | Écoute du chinois | Ascolto cinese | Audição em chinês | ???? ????? | ???????? ??? ????? ????????English Translation???: Have you seen those “adult English” livestreams lately? The female host stands in front of a blackboard and dresses quite revealingly.??: I’ve seen them. They claim to teach English, but it’s really all about using sexual innuendo to attract traffic, even the vocabulary is suggestive.??: Many netizens think it’s inappropriate, especially since minors might also see it. This already affects public morals.??: From a business perspective, this is edge-marketing: high short-term traffic, but also high risk.??: Lawyers have also said that even without explicit nudity, if sexual innuendo is the core, it counts as illegal marketing.??: Then platforms can’t pretend they don’t see it. Algorithmic recommendations themselves amplify this kind of content.??: Right. Platforms have responsibilities for pre-review, ongoing control, and post-incident handling. When problems arise, they can’t punish only the streamer.??: In the end, teaching should return to teaching. Otherwise, the industry’s reputation will suffer, and no one will benefit.